Animal Activists Defy Science and
Logic
Hartford, CT. – October 27, 2000:
In a statement released today by Connecticut
Trappers Association, Public Relations Director, Robert Andryzeck
commenting on the purchase of the State Land trapping rights by an
animal activist group, he observed that:
“Animal activists have today done with
money and emotion what they could not do with science and logic.” He
noted that recently the activists were unable to persuade Hartford
Superior Court Judge Carl Schuman to stop the awarding of State Land trapping
rights through a bidding process. Indeed, in an October 5th ruling, the court
found that trapping “ … serves a number of important public policy
objectives. Among them … the protection of persons … property …
endangered species … wetlands, … as well as a variety of recreational and
cultural interests. “ The Court further found that, “ At
times, there are no reasonable alternatives to lethal trapping. “
Unable to stop state land trapping in Court, a
small group of animal activists has for the time being, usurped the judgement
of DEP professional wildlife managers through the State Land trapping bid
process. While the activists today tout their purchase of the state land
trapping rights as a victory, the Connecticut Trappers Association believes
that this tactic flies in the face of sound wildlife management policy.
Mr. Andryzeck cites the recent escalation of conflicts
between humans and certain furbearers as evidence of the necessity of
trapping. Connecticut has recently increased beaver harvest limits to address
mounting citizen complaints of property damage by beaver. He notes that one
need look no further than Massachusetts, which recently banned trapping and
now faces an exploding beaver population and millions of dollars of potential
property damage. He further observes that Connecticut has over the past few
years weathered one of the most severe rabies outbreaks in modern times. Since
1991, the CT Dept. of Health has confirmed approx. 4355 animals have tested
positive with rabies.
Connecticut trappers remove primarily aquatic furbearers such as
beaver, muskrat, raccoon, and mink. These animals exist in Connecticut in
healthy and abundant numbers and their populations are not endangered or
threatened by trapping. Mr. Andryzeck echoed the Court’s observation that
trapping does indeed serve the public interest and
animal populations.
Mr. Andryzeck warns that sportsman statewide should be aware that
animal activist philosophy will soon be knocking on their door. Recently,
campaigns have been waged against both hunting, fishing, and suprisingly
enough, medical research. No sportsman should be precluded from pursuing their
legally sanctioned activity based upon the emotional opinions of a few
activists.
For additional information, please contact Robert
Andryzeck at (860) 668-4477
*****
Animal rights groups say they submitted
winning bids on 90% of land open to trapping
By Paul Choiniere - More Articles
Published on 10/28/2000
Animal rights activists said Friday they had submitted winning bids on about
90 percent of all state lands open to animal trapping, a move they say will
keep the parcels trapping free this winter.
Supporters of two animal rights groups — Friends of
Animals and the Animal Rights Front — had obtained trapping licenses and
taken the state's trapping program, entitling them to bid on the 122 parcels
that are annually opened for trapping.
Bob Orabona, operations director for Friends of Animals,
said the group submitted the winning bid on 109 of 122 parcels, totaling about
148,000 acres. With the winning bid comes exclusive rights on a parcel to use
leg traps and box traps to catch and kill animals. The organizations, of
course, plan to do no trapping.
Attorney Derek V. Oatis of Manchester, who represents the
animal rights organizations, said they submitted bids ranging from $1 to
$1,200, depending on the expected value of a parcel to trappers and past
bidding. The bids totaled about $30,000. The average bid was about $275,
according to the groups. The program is managed by the state Department of
Environmental Protection, which could not immediately verify the results.
Trapping season begins in November and continues through
mid-March. The DEP and the animal rights groups have clashed in court over the
trapping program in the past. The DEP last year tried to block access to the
bidding to traditional trappers, but failed in court. The legal fight led to a
cancellation of any trapping on state lands last year. This year the activists
tried to stop the trapping program, but they failed in court and turned to
their bidding strategy instead.
There is potential for the controversy to continue. Paul
Rego, the wildlife biologist at the DEP in charge of the program, said
individuals with the rights to a parcel are obligated to conduct trapping if
an animal is judged a nuisance. If the winning bidder refuses to do so then
someone else can be given permission to trap on the parcel, he said.
Oatis said the animal rights activists are prepared to
fulfill that obligation, using traps to capture animals alive and relocate
them. The most common problem in the state is beaver dams that cause flooding
of private property or roads or deluge wetlands that are important habitats
for other animals, Rego said.
The controversy could come over what is considered a
nuisance. Oatis, for example, said the groups would not be willing to capture
otters that are reducing fish stock for recreational fishing, a practice that
has been done in the past.
The animals that can be trapped in Connecticut are river
otter, beaver, mink, muskrat, weasel, coyote, gray fox, red fox, raccoon,
opossum and skunk. A license, but no state approval, is needed to trap these
animals on private land.
“More than anything, it's the cruelty of this activity
that motivates these groups to try and stop it,” Oatis said. “They (the
DEP) claim this is a way to manage wildlife. If so, it's the most bizarre and
brutal way of doing it.”
Trappers, however, defend the activity, saying most
animals are killed quickly by the traps and that, by doing daily checking,
they ensure no animal lingers in a trap for long.
Attempts to contact several trappers for their reaction
to the latest developments were not successful.
****
Animal rights activists trying to
outfox trappers
They hope to tie up all state land available for trapping
By Paul Choiniere - More Articles
Published on 10/27/2000
If the animal rights activists get their way, no one will trap an animal on
state land this winter.
Ready to spend more than $36,000 for that purpose, the
activists are attempting to outbid trappers for the right to trap and kill
everything from river otters to red foxes on all 122 parcels the state makes
available for trapping.
The activists won't be doing any trapping, of course. And
if they get control of the lands, they won't allow anyone else to do any,
either. Friends of Animals and the Animal Rights Front are working together to
try to cease control of trapping parcels.
The state Department of Environmental Protection is
scheduled to open the bids today. The trapping season begins next month and
continues through March. The exclusive right to trap on a parcel is good for a
year.
Claude “Tip” Garritt of Columbia, a member of the
Connecticut Trappers' Association, said the activists are unfairly trying to
deny trappers access to an activity allowed by law.
“They are thwarting a wildlife management program that
has done a good job of controlling some wildlife populations,” Garritt said.
Trappers are growing aggravated, he said. Last year there
was no trapping on public lands because a court fight between the activists
and the state led to the season's cancellation.
In a recent decision, Hartford Superior Court Judge Carl
Schuman rejected an attempt by the animal rights activists to block the coming
trapping season. Schuman said at the time that the DEP made a strong case that
trapping is necessary to protect other animals, farms, wetlands and people's
property.
The animals that can be trapped in Connecticut are river
otter, beaver, mink, muskrat, weasel, coyote, gray fox, red fox, raccoon,
opossum and skunk. Trappers need a $20 license, but not state approval, to
trap on their own property or property where they have the owner's permission.
“Many (of these) wildlife species are abundant in
Connecticut, so much so that some species frequently damage property and cause
other conflicts with humans,” said DEP Deputy Commissioner David Leff. The
DEP annually receives hundreds of complaints about property damage caused by
beavers, raccoons, coyote and foxes, he said.
The 122 sites opened to trapping include 697 acres of the
Assekonk Swamp in North Stonington, more than 1,000 acres on Barn Island in
Stonington, and nearly 4,000 acres of Nehantic State Forest in Lyme, East Lyme,
Old Lyme and Salem.
Bids for the right to trap on the parcels can range from
tens of dollars to hundreds of dollars, depending on how fertile the trapping
area, said Paul Rego of the DEP. Rego is a wildlife biologist and director of
the trapping program.
Bill Mannetti, speaking for the animal rights groups,
said 31 animal rights supporters have submitted bids covering all 122 parcels,
totaling 160,000 acres.
“When the sealed bids are opened ... we'll know how
astute our bidding has been and we'll have a rough idea how many animals will
be spared,” Mannetti said.
There are two primary kinds of traps: the leg trap that
clamps on an animal's leg and a box trap that snaps shut and kills the animal
quickly. Animals recovered alive from leg traps are usually shot and killed.
Animals are trapped for their pelts, to be stuffed as trophies or simply
because they are a nuisance. Non-killing traps are used to move animals to
different locations.
Rego said trapping is carefully regulated. Traps must be
checked every day and there are restrictions on trap size and placement.
Critics say it kills indiscriminately when other animals wander into the
traps.
Animal rights groups began bidding in 1986, obtaining two
parcels. By 1998 they had managed to win the rights for 35 of the parcels,
totaling 47,000 acres. In response to the strategy, the DEP has trimmed land
rights from four years to one, so that activists cannot tie up trapping lands
for long periods.
In 1999 the DEP, feeling the intent of the program was
being undermined, began requiring proof that those submitting bids were
actually capturing animals. That led to a court fight and the suspension of
the program for the 1999-2000 trapping season.
Now the department has returned to the 1998 rules, only
requiring that bidders have a trapper's license and proof they took the
state's trapping course. All its bidders meet the requirements, Mannetti said.
There are about 400 licensed trappers in Connecticut.
Animal Rights Groups Lose
Attempt To Stop Trapping On State Lands
http://dep.state.ct.us/whatshap/press/2000/mf1023.htm
A Superior Court judge’s ruling on Thursday, October
5, denied the most recent attempt by animal rights groups to impede a Department
of Environmental Protection (DEP) program that allows the trapping of animals
such as beavers, raccoons, coyotes and muskrats on selected state properties.
The animal rights groups sought an injunction to halt this year’s state land
trapping program. The program, which was established over 40 years ago, is
important for managing wildlife on state forests and wildlife management areas.
Also, the program allows persons who are licensed to trap and have completed a
trapping education course the opportunity to harvest furbearing animals.
The judge discounted the animal rights groups’ claims
that the state land trapping program unreasonably destroys natural resources and
thereby violated state law. The judge also discounted the assertion that this
year’s guidelines violated an earlier settlement in which DEP agreed to remove
a requirement that trappers demonstrate past trapping experience; a requirement
that animal rights activists claimed excluded them from purchasing trapping
permits.
The requirement was put forward by DEP to help ensure
that knowledgeable and experienced trappers will participate in trapping on
state lands to ensure proper application of this wildlife management tool.
Evidence and testimony indicated many potential benefits
from regulated trapping, including habitat protection, reducing or resolving
property damage caused by some animals and the use of trapped animals for food
and pelts. Testimony also highlighted that trapping is strictly regulated and
only allowed for common species.
"Many wildlife populations are abundant in
Connecticut, so much so that some species frequently damage property and cause
other conflicts with humans," said DEP Deputy Commissioner David K. Leff.
The DEP annually receives hundreds of complaints from citizens about beavers,
raccoons, coyotes and foxes.
The judge’s ruling allows trapping opportunities to be
assigned for this winter’s trapping season. In denying the animal rights
groups’ application for a temporary injunction, the judge reasoned that such
an action would essentially shut down the 2000 trapping season on state lands
with all its attendant benefits to the ecology, the economy and the recreational
interests of Connecticut citizens.
Trapping Bids Delayed As Activists
Seek Injunction
The Associated Press
September 27, 2000
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) A Superior Court judge on Wednesday ordered the Department
of Environmental Protection to delay bidding for trapping rights on state land
while he hears the complaints of animal rights groups who claim they are being
denied access to the process.
Bidding on 122 parcels of land was scheduled to open Oct. 2. But two groups,
Friends of Animals and the Animal Rights Front, are seeking an injunction that
force the DEP to drop a requirement that would force those who bid to actually
trap animals.
The groups also sued the DEP last year after the agency tried to require that
fur trappers prove they have experience in order to bid for access to state
land.
DEP officials said they wanted to ensure only experienced trappers worked on
state land. The agency said their help is needed to control the population of
beavers, raccoons, foxes and other animals.
But the animal rights groups had argued the law was meant to shut them out. The
group and others had bought rights to 47,000 acres in 1988, as a way to prevent
trapping on that land.
The court challenge forced the cancellation of the 1999 trapping season. Earlier
this month, the DEP agreed to withdraw the experience requirement and the
activists agreed to drop their request for an injunction.
But the activists claim a new proposal by DEP Commissioner Arthur Rocque to
require that those awarded trapping rights capture a minimum number of animals
would also shut them out.
''This is very much the same principal here,'' said Bill Manetti, of Animal
Rights Front.
DEP officials declined to comment on the ruling.
The trapping season runs from November to March.
AP-ES-09-27-00 1836